Plaintiffs have actually neglected to allege any resulting damage as needed by the pay day loan statut
See Mo. Rev. Stat. В§ 408.562 (permitting civil actions by events loss that is suffering of or home” arising from violations of cash advance statute). While Count III it self makes just the allegation that is general Plaintiffs “are aggrieved and experienced ascertainable losings,” Plaintiffs do allege elsewhere within the grievance that restricting renewals caused illegally-high final re payments and exorbitant interest costs. The type of Plaintiffs’ MPA and pay day loan allegations, look over in general, are adequate to place Advance on notice of Plaintiffs’ claim for losings resulting from Advance’s actions. See StreamCast Networks, Inc. v. IBIS LLC, No. CV 05-04239, 2006 WL 5720345, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Might 2, 2006) (finding damages allegations sufficient where complaint alleged generally “[a]s a direct and proximate reason behind [contractual] breach, [Plaintiff] is eligible to recover every one of its damages so it has suffered”); Wendler Ezra, P.C.